Digitalization is the most disruptive force affecting global markets today.

Larry Clinton Pres. & CEO Internet Security Alliance

Larry Clinton
Pres. & CEO
Internet Security Alliance

Forum Host Bill  Raisch:  Larry as CEO of the Internet Security Alliance, you have a definitive multi-sector perspective both through your members as well as through your wider engagement.   Your organization has also done a substantial amount of research in the digital arena and produced some significant thought leadership as well as policy products to the US Government and others.

With that lens as a starting point, What do you see as one of the most important disruptors facing global corporations, markets and/or wider society?

Larry Clinton:  The digital revolution is the most disruptive force affecting global markets today.  Most organizations have by now begun to factor into their business plans the positive elements of digitization such as web based marketing, inventory efficiencies, off-site servicing and employee management systems.  Moreover, the globalization of markets has been tremendously accelerated by digitalization bringing both massive new opportunities and new competitors, However enterprises have been slow to appreciate the full extent of their vulnerability to cyber-attacks. Many organizations are still limiting their notion of the downside of digital attacks to comparatively small items such as IT and website downtime. In reality their most precious business secrets, intellectual property and long term competitiveness are being challenged.  Sometimes their security is being undermined by competitive needs to adopt strategies and technologies, such as the use of international supply chains and cloud computing systems that inherently undermine their security. Many are also fighting advanced cyber threats with outdated theories and systems such as perimeter defense, oriented anti-virus and passwords that are of marginal effectiveness against modern attacks.

Bill Raisch:   Ok, then what do you see as the potential impacts of “digitalization” as a disruptor?

Larry Clinton:  Digitalization has fundamentally changed the way we need to understand almost everything, concepts of self, concepts of privacy, concepts of national defense and business economics.  Its disruptive effects are barely being considered let alone fully understood.

 Bill Raisch:  Then what strategies would you suggest to address the digitalization disruptor – to either mitigate negative impacts and/or to capitalize on potential opportunities?

Larry Clinton: There are many many things that ought to be done to manage the effect digitization’s effects.  The most basic of these is to broaden the notion of what we are discussing.  Too often both corporate and national policy makers are thinking of cyber issues as simply “IT” issues to be managed by technologies and associated standards and practices.  In reality this is an enterprise-wide risk management issue that must be understood and addressed in a multi-faceted and comprehensive approach integrating technology with business economics (both the good and the bad) as well as enlightened national policy.

 

Posted by Bill Raisch, Host – Global Disruptors Forum

Disruption / manipulation of critical information – crippling flow of funds, transportation …

Chief Technology Officer - Financial Services Roundtable

Chief Technology Officer – Financial Services Roundtable

Forum Host Bill Raisch:  Dan, you have extensive experience in current and emerging technologies with a special focus on a very sensitive arena, that of payments and other banking business applications.

What do you see as one of the most important disruptors facing global corporations, markets and/or wider society?

Dan Schutzer:  Disruption and manipulation of critical information – trading prices, air traffic control, network routing, etc.

Bill Raisch:  What are the potential impacts of this disruptor?

Dan Schutzer:  Could cripple the orderly flow of funds, transportation, information

Bill Raisch:  What strategies would you suggest to address this disruptor – to either mitigate negative impacts and/or to capitalize on potential opportunities?

Dan Schutzer: Implement a stronger identity ecosystem able to distinguish between legitimate and manipulated/false signals and messages.

Posted by Bill Raisch, Host – Global Disruptors Forum

Digital disruptions and the potential for quick tailspins for markets, reputations, brands and communities

Vice President for Research & Emerging Issues, US Chamber of Commerce Foundation; Principal, Catalyst Partners LLC

Vice President for Research & Emerging Issues, US Chamber of Commerce Foundation; Principal, Catalyst Partners LLC

Forum Host Bill Raisch:  Rich, in terms of “disruptors,” you have broad and diverse experience ranging from your current work on emerging issues at the US Chamber of Commerce to your prior responsibilities at US Homeland Security and NASA as well as work in the high tech field and a variety of other arenas.

From this broad perspective, what do you see as one of the most important disruptors facing global corporations, markets and/or wider society?

Rich Cooper:  On top of the traditional disruptors (e.g. Mother Nature; acts of violence/terror, infrastructure failures, etc.) we now have the advent of the digital disruptor.  All it takes is a simple post to a social media outlet (be it from a hacker; or disaffected customer or rival) that can quickly go viral that can send a market, a reputation or a community into a tailspin.

The very dynamic tools that keep people informed and engaged are extremely susceptible to hacking, hijack and hyperbole.  All you have to do is take a look at the recent hacking of the Associated Press’ Twitter account about “an attack upon President Obama” that sent the trading markets into a brief tailspin. Even some of the real time reporting that was factual and other reports that were later determined to be fictional regarding the recent bombings at the Boston Marathon created anxiety and other challenges for people, law enforcement and others in the greater Boston area.

Companies, communities and organizations of all sizes and shapes are going to have to engage in a 24/7 vigilance of their on-line reputations like never before or risk the long and short term consequences to their reputations if they ignore these tools and how they are used and misused.

Bill Raisch:  What are the potential impacts of this digital disruptor?

Rich Cooper: Real dollars and cents are always at play in any disruption but so are the potential negative impacts to reputation and brand recognition.  The phrase “you only have one chance to make a first impression,” comes to mind but it is inherently unfair when digital disruptors come into play and they can turn a solid reputation into absolute ruin by a few clicks and keystrokes.

Because of the actions of a hacker, the Associated Press is now in a position where they not only have to respond to false information that was put out under their name, they have to address the vulnerability of their networks by outside forces. They must try to not make themselves part of a news story (which is not where a news organization wants to be – they want to report stories – not be their subject line). Further they must try to restore the confidence in their brand and reputation that their customers and consumers have in the information that the AP puts out on a regular basis.

This is just not an AP issue.  Other government departments and agencies; educational institutions, private sector members and individuals have found themselves victims of similar types of digital disruptors.  We hear about the big names and big incidents when things like the AP story, the Boston bombings and other events occur but this is a 24/7 circumstance that is growing exponentially as more and more people and organizations become connected and interact digitally to the world around them.

Bill Raisch:  So what strategies would you suggest to address this digital disruptor – to either mitigate negative impacts and/or to capitalize on potential opportunities?

Rich Cooper:  The same strategies that you deploy for any other type of disruptor should be applied in these circumstances and it all starts with vigilance and awareness.  Accepting and understanding that these types of events can happen to you and in all likelihood will happen to you in some shape or form is part of the game.  Thinking that your name and brand are unsinkable and untouchable are the famous last words of the captain of the Titanic and we all know how that ends.   You end up becoming a test case for what not to do in these circumstances and a perpetual example of what not to do forevermore.

It is possible to capitalize on these opportunities though if you demonstrate the veracity of your vigilance; show your attention to detail and address the circumstances head on and apply the lessons learned immediately.  I think the example of the recent hacking of the Associated Press account demonstrates how quickly they addressed the situation to correct the mis-information that was put forward; share what happened and discuss corrective actions and therefore reinforce the integrity of their name and daily works.

Some may argue that this all comes down to active messaging and that would be entirely true because if you are not vigilant and active to recognize the situation and address it accordingly, you risk greater harm long-term by showing your ignorance and non-acceptance of the situation.  In those situations, I don’t care what form your disruptor takes, you are hamstringing your response from being effective, strategic and addressing the circumstance head on.

Posted by Bill Raisch, Host – Global Disruptors Forum

Cascading impacts from the inability to communicate information & data

Gil Meyer – DuPont Director of Global Issues Management & Trend Analysis

Gil Meyer – DuPont Director of Global Issues Management & Trend Analysis

Forum Host Bill Raisch:  Gil, you’re charged with looking at global issues for DuPont.  The firm is active in a diversity of industries from agriculture to electronics and has a presence in over 90 countries.

What do you see as one of the most important disruptors facing global corporations, markets and/or wider society?

Gil Meyer:  Cybersecurity – Civil society and world economics rely on electronic systems in so many ways that a successful cyber-attack could seriously cripple our functioning. Few people seem to recognize how reliant we are on electronic systems and therefore how vulnerable our lifestyles are.

Bill Raisch:  What are the potential impacts of this disruptor?

Gil Meyer:  One example is that our ability to communicate information and data could collapse, which would undermine everything: emergency response, basic business transactions, all aspects of transportation, etc. The secondary and tertiary effects could be enormous.

Bill Raisch:  What strategies would you suggest to address this disruptor – to either mitigate negative impacts and/or to capitalize on potential opportunities?

Gil Meyer:  Society apparently assumes that the only way to operate the internet and other electronic systems is in a generally wide open fashion. That unchecked freedom is ideal for those who desire to disrupt. Eventually we will come to the realization that greater levels of control are needed. In all probability, that realization will only come after a major event.

Posted by Bill Raisch, Host – Global Disruptors Forum

Lack of confidence in our data leading to distrust across government, business and wider society

Steve Chabinsky – Past Deputy Assistant Director, FBI Cyber Division; Current SVP - Legal Affairs & Chief Risk Officer, Crowd Strike

Steve Chabinsky – Fmr. Deputy Assistant Director, FBI Cyber Division; Current SVP – Legal Affairs & Chief Risk Officer, Crowd Strike

Forum Host Bill Raisch:  Steve, you organized and led the FBI’s Cyber Intelligence Program as well as serving in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.  You are now Chief Risk Officer for the cybersecurity technology firm, CrowdStrike.  You definitely have a distinct perspective on the cyber world.

What do you see as one of the most important disruptors facing global corporations, markets and/or wider society? 

Steve Chabinsky:  The increasing inability to have a high level of confidence that our data, as well as technology driven products and services, are and will remain (1) available;  (2) reliable; and (3) exclusively within the owners control.

Bill Raisch:  What are the potential impacts of this lack of confidence in data?

Steve Chabinsky:  Governments will be unable to rely upon their military platforms. Businesses and professional practices will be unable to protect corporate secrets, client confidences, or customer data, and will be unable to rely upon electronic commerce platforms. Society will grow to distrust technology, and will be at risk of loss of life when driving automobiles or having implanted medical devices, all of which can be hacked.

Bill Raisch:  What strategies would you suggest to address this disruptor – to either mitigate negative impacts and/or to capitalize on potential opportunities?

Steve Chabinsky:  The primary design element of certain technologies will begin to include assurance and attribution, allowing for quick detection of hostile activity, graceful declining of service, and attribution to determine responsibility.  Governments will begin to pay less attention to the impossible goal of security through invulnerability, and will start focusing first and foremost on threat mitigation efforts in coordination with the private sector.

Posted by Bill Raisch, Host – Global Disruptors Forum

Cyber

We welcome insights on top Cyber Disruptions including but not limited to the following key areas:

  • Hacktivism & Anonymous
  • New Cyber Disruptors: Disjointed International Efforts, the New US Presidential Executive Order and No Red Phone
  • Crippling State-Sponsored Industrial Espionage
  • The Prospect of Massive Attacks: Digital Misinformation / Data Fraud / Theft
  • The Bring-Your-Own-Device Frontier